Putin Leads World Financial Revolution!
At one point in history it was thought that if one country fell to Communism, others would follow like dominoes. Hence the origin of the “domino theory”. It appears that we are entering a new phase of the domino theory, where in, the countries might not fall directly, but rather their financial bases are to be rearranged and linked, one after another like dominoes. This will most likely produce the same result as the original domino theory, but over a longer period of time. The global supranational currency is not a good thing because it once again increases the power of the purveyors of fiat currency and in the case of the U.S., takes the power further away from the sovereignty of the U.S. and puts it into international, or should I say, supranational hands. This move, if completed, will be a death blow to U.S. sovereignty and the beginning of one world government.
This cannot be accomplished over night and for that matter it may never come to be with out willing accomplices on both sides. Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and Valdimir Putin (for this discussion I will assert that all decisions come from Putin) will try everything in their power to convince enough nations that unless their plan is implemented, financial chaos will rain down on the world and it will ultimately lead to global war. It appears that, unfortunately for the United States, the Obama Administration and the U.S. Congress have been humming the same tune with regards to the economic crisis in the U.S. That is to say, that if we don’t pass these bills immediately, without discussion, economic chaos will rain down on the U.S. economy. Both sides have their own agenda’s which it is safe to say in no way are encouraging to individual freedoms. Pick your own poison. Both are headed down the same path even though they have started from different origins.
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has repeatedly called for creating a mix of regional reserve currencies as part of the drive to address the global financial crisis, while questioning the dollar’s future as a global reserve currency. Russia’s proposals for the Group of 20 major developed and developing nations summit in London in April included the creation of a supranational currency. Now at the G-8 meeting Putin, through Mevedev, has cast the new coin of the realm on to the table in physical form. To be sure, both the Russians and the Chinese want the new reserve currency to be tied to gold and for good reason. They have been gradually moving their surplus dollar holdings into gold and out of the U.S. dollar. They stand to make huge gains if the new global currency is linked, at least initially, to gold.

United Future World Currency as Displayed at the G-8 Meeting
“We will resume talks on the supranational currency proposal at the G-8 summit in LAquila on July 8-10″, Medvedev aide Sergei Prikhodko told reporters in Moscow, and boy did they ever do that with the presentation of the coin.
The coin made of gold will launch the new supranational currency, but the coin above, or one similar to it, will be the one that the proletariat will use in their day to day transactions. The advantage of a single fiat currency for the globe goes to those in power that control it’s value.
World government one, free people zero!
I wonder if Putin brought up the subject of the supranational currency in his private talks with President Obama? Two opposing forces are coming to a day of reckoning. Putin wants a new reserve currency, partial backed by gold, which will propel Russia and China to the financial forefront and greatly multiply the value of their gold holdings while diminishing the power and the influence of the U.S President Obama, on the other hand, wants to implement his Neo -Marxist agenda while devaluing the U.S. dollar in order to pay for his proposals. Neither one, if successful, will produce a more prosperous and safer world.
If Putin is successful it won’t be long before the new world currency is de-linked from gold so that the new masters can enjoy the secret taxation of currency inflation. If President Obama is successful, the “nanny-state” will grow massively and the U.S. will cease to be a super power as the ship of state founders under hyper-inflation.
WHO IS MOST LIKELY TO WIN IN THIS BATTLE FOR THE FUTURE?
Russia is mired in a post communist economy which has been beaten up even more by the global recession. On the upside, Putin has embraced capitalism to the extant that it can repair his economy and increase his power. Another plus on Putin’s side is Putin himself. He is a leader! He is the former head of the KGB, with all that that entails, he was the President of Russia and for all intents and purposes he still is!
On the other side of the ledger, we have President Obama. In any meeting that he attends, he is the least qualified person in the room! He was schooled in the corruption of Chicago politics and his main experience was as a “community organizer”. For those of you new to the term, you can substitute “political agitator” for the those extremely left of center. During his one term in the Senate he missed more votes than any other Senator. I guess it is not to wise to show your true colors too early in the game! He is intent on being the first person to institute Marxism correctly, since all those before him have not succeeded as of yet.
Two “somewhat” different approaches to how power should be wielded. I’ll leave it to you to draw your own conclusions as to who will come out on top in this game.
Russia yields to request by US
Allowing weapons to cross its terrain, enter Afghanistan
By Nataliya Vasilyeva
Associated Press / July 4, 2009
MOSCOW – Russia said yesterday that it will allow the United States to ship weapons across its territory to Afghanistan, a long-sought move that bolsters US military operations but potentially gives the Kremlin leverage over critical American supplies.
The announcement by a top Kremlin aide came ahead of President Obama’s visit to Moscow next week, when the deal is expected to be signed during a summit aimed at improving the nations strained relations.
Russia’s concession on arms shipments also came as the Obama administration is shifting the US military’s focus from Iraq to Afghanistan, where a massive American offensive is underway in Taliban-controlled areas of Helmand Province.
Russia has been allowing the United States to ship non-lethal supplies across its territory for operations in Afghanistan, and Kremlin officials had suggested further cooperation was probable.
Kremlin foreign policy adviser Sergei Prikhodko said yesterday that the expected deal would enable the United States to ship lethal cargo and would include shipments by air and land.
He said it was unclear whether US soldiers or other personnel would be permitted to travel through Russian territory or airspace. They haven’t asked us for it, he said.
Confirmation of such a deal appeared aimed at setting a constructive tone for the meetings between Obama and Russia’s president, Dmitry Medvedev, on Monday and Tuesday.
Military analyst Alexander Golts, however, said the United States should be under no illusion about Russia’s intentions. Although Medvedev has set a warmer tone in relations with the West, his predecessor, Vladimir Putin, retains considerable power as prime minister.
The least impression you should get from this is that Putin’s foreign policy style foresees gestures of good will, Golts said. The Russian leadership still has the mindset of “19th-century Realpolitik” and seeks the ability to hold its partners “by the throat,” he said.
Putin giveth and Putin can taketh away! Working with the U.S. on Afghanistan is a very smart move on Putin’s part. First it allows him to deal with an old thorn in his side, Afghanistan, without having to spend a dime or use his military. With but a simple gesture he can get the U.S. to accomplish for him what the Soviet Union could not do while they were engaged in Afghanistan. He not only exacts revenge on the Afghans, but he also holds his partner “by the throat”, because he can revoke the favor at any time if he needs to increase his leverage for any reason.
Advantage Putin! Perhaps he may call in this chip while negotiating the nuclear arms reduction agreement to replace the 1991 START treaty, which expires in December.
PUTIN REJECTS OBAMA’S CRITICISM BEFORE MEETING.
Fri Jul 3, 2009 3:08pm EDT
By Gleb Bryanski
MOSCOW (Reuters) – Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin on Friday rejected U.S. President Barack Obama’s charge that he was mired in Cold War thinking, setting the scene for a stormy first meeting at a Moscow summit next week.
In a pre-trip interview, the U.S. leader told the Associated Press that Putin needed to “understand that the Cold War approach to U.S.-Russian relationship is outdated” and that Putin had “one foot in the old ways of doing business.”
Putin — who once described the collapse of the Soviet Union as “the greatest geo-political catastrophe of the century” — hit back, saying Russians were standing firmly on both feet.
“We are standing firmly on both feet and always look to the future. That is the peculiarity of Russia. That has always allowed Russia to move forward and get stronger. That will continue,” Putin was shown saying with a smile on state television.
Putin remains the dominant force in the Russian power structure after stepping down as Kremlin chief in 2008. His meeting with Obama next week is likely to set the tone for relations between the world’s two biggest nuclear powers.
Putin also called on the United States to move relations forward by shelving plans for a missile defense shield in Europe and called for Washington to change its approach to expanding the NATO military alliance.
“If we see (that) our American partners refrain from deploying new missile complexes, anti-missile defense systems, or for example review their approach to widening military-political blocs, or generally refrain from bloc-like thinking, this would be a big movement forward,” Putin said.
When asked about Obama’s comments, a spokesman for Putin said the prime minister would use the summit to relieve the president of his mistaken impressions.
“I see that he does not possess full information. After visiting Moscow, President Obama will know the realities better,” said Putin spokesman Dmitry Peskov.
“Judging by these statements it is very good that the meeting with Prime Minister Putin is on President Obama’s agenda. I am sure that after the meeting with Putin, President Obama will change his point of view,” Peskov added.
And after all was said and done, what were the results?
Obama, Putin Hold Private Talks In Russia
July 7, /2009 Steven R. Hurst /AP
MOSCOW : For two days, President Barack Obama pressed the reset button with Russia. The results: He ended up getting the expected agreement on deep cuts in nuclear arsenals, but he is leaving Moscow with few assurances of Kremlin help in solving other issues key to his foreign policy agenda.
He is also leaving behind a spark he hopes will blaze to life and thaw U.S. relations with a former superpower with a chip on its shoulder. But his two days of summitry produced no unexpected breakthroughs.
Throughout the meetings and speeches, Obama stayed on message: The United States and Russia have too many overlapping interests to move through the coming decades at odds. The time for confrontational Cold War thinking is well-past. America wants Russia to be “strong, peaceful and prosperous.”
He told the graduating class at Moscow’s New Economic School that the United States and Russia were not “destined to be antagonists,” but he predicted, nevertheless, hard bargaining as the two nations work to overcome a long history of estrangement.
“It is difficult to forge a lasting partnership between former adversaries. But I believe on the fundamental issues that will shape this century, Americans and Russians share common interests that form a basis for cooperation,” he said.
On several issues key to Obama foreign policy, the Russians were unbending, at least for now.
While they agreed to join the U.S. in reassessing the threat from Iran’s nuclear ambitions, there was no hoped-for Kremlin offer of direct intervention with Tehran. The Russians make significant profits from arms sales to Iran and the construction a nuclear complex for electricity generation.
On the flash point issue of Georgia, where the Russian army crushed the tiny country’s military a year ago, the Kremlin rejected U.S. complaints about Russian insistence that breakaway Abkhazia and South Ossetia remain free of Georgian control. Moscow, meantime, remained angry over U.S. refusal to back away from support for Georgia’s hopes to join NATO.
After his breakfast meeting with Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, Obama told Fox News Channel “on areas where we disagree, like Georgia, I don’t anticipate a meeting of the minds anytime soon.”
Nor did there appear to have been progress in the dispute over arms control. While preparing a START I replacement treaty that would cut nuclear arsenals by about one-third, Moscow and Washington remained fundamentally at odds over U.S. plans for creating a missile defense system in Eastern Europe. U.S. officials discount Russian complaints about American intentions. But Moscow was still saying the two issues must be linked or a final agreement on cutting nuclear warheads and delivery systems could be in jeopardy. Washington insists missile defense is designed to protect U.S. allies against a potential nuclear attack by Iran. The Russians say such a system would put them at a disadvantage by unbalancing offensive nuclear parity.
The two sides did agree to far greater cooperation on Afghanistan, where Obama is bolstering U.S. troop strength in the fight against Taliban militants and other al-Qaida allied groups. Part of the deal will allow the U.S. to fly, without transit charges, American troops, weapons and other lethal war materiel across Russian territory. Such U.S. overflights had been limited to non-lethal supplies for the U.S.-led NATO force in Afghanistan, a country from which Russia withdrew in defeat 20 years ago after a decade-long occupation.
Negotiators also prepared a series of side agreements and established a commission nominally headed by Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev. It is designed to quicken the pace of U.S.-Russian engagement across a whole range of issues important to both countries.
As the days roll by it will become clearer that Putin will take the new U.S. President to school. It is unfortunate that when, “we the people”, were asked to find a leader we were found profoundly lacking in the knowledge of what it takes to lead. Undoubtedly 60 years of government control of the education system had a major part to play in this, but it should not be the last word. It is time for the American people to stand up and correct the mistake that was made last November. Our children and grandchildren will be paying for the financial folly that we are currently going through, for the rest of their lives. The “change” that we were sold, is not the “change” that we are getting!
Good luck America! We are going to need it!
Also Noteworthy:
- Putin On Capitalism and the Financial Crisis
- Putin Capitalism
- Of Gold, The Dollar, Russia, China and Vending Machines!
- Gold and the Dollar: Joined at the Hip
- Green Shoots or Putin Power?
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/gold/t24_au_en_usoz_2.gif)
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/silver/t24_ag_en_usoz_2.gif)
Recent Comments